Harris introduces new public-safety LTE smartphone

Harris today announced the launch of the InTouch RPC-200, a ruggedized LTE smartphone that will be able to operate on commercial carrier networks and Band 14 public-safety LTE systems.
Unveiled and demonstrated at the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) show in San Diego, the InTouch includes typical smartphone features such as the Android 4.1 operating system and a commercial LTE chipset. But the device also includes public-safety characteristics, such as a large push-to-talk button, waterproof speakers and noise-cancellation technology.
“It feels in your hand like a ruggedized tool, not necessarily a commercial device,” Paul May, senior product manager for Harris, said during an interview with Urgent Communications. “But it is still relatively light and relatively small—it’s very easy to stick in your pocket and carry around during the day.
“It has the types of features that users would associate with smart phones, in terms of being able to browse and being able to connect to Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. But they would also recognize immediately the LMR heritage of the device, with the larger push-to-talk, the larger speaker and its general ruggedness.”
Because InTouch works on both public-safety Band 14 systems and commercial-carrier networks—including 2G and 3G networks, if LTE access is not available—the device should be valuable to agencies that want to leverage commercial LTE capabilities until the planned nationwide public-safety LTE network is deployed in their geographic jurisdictions, May said.
In addition, the device is designed to support the Harris BeOn technology, which enables encrypted, push-to-talk P25 voice communication via private LTE or commercial-network connectivity to an LMR network, May said.
“I would say that it is capable of delivering voice critical for a mission, but I think the users have to determine whether this is the right device for them to support them in their operation,” May said. “There are certain instances where you would want to have a direct-mode, talkaround capability—for example, a firefighter running into a burning building. In that case, this is probably the wrong device for them.
“However, for a battalion chief that is outside that building and needs to be able to access databases, wants to be able to able to track users and equipment with mapping capabilities, is interested in providing video back to a command center, this might be the right device for them.”
With the InTouch, Harris has announced both a smartphone and tablet device for public-safety LTE users. The company announced the BTC-100 public-safety LTE tablet during the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) show in August.
Harris will be securing certifications for the InTouch during the next several months and plans to make the device commercially available next summer, May said. A price point for the device has not been determined yet, but “we think it will be lower than you might typically see for high-end LMR devices—I would say somewhere over $1,000 would be the expectation,” May said.

By Donny Jackson 

10 smartphone habits you should avoid


Editor's note: Brenna Ehrlich and Andrea Bartz are the sarcastic brains behind humor blog and book "Stuff Hipsters Hate." Got a question about etiquette in the digital world? Contact them at netiquette@cnn.com.
We begin this week's column with a stunningly beautiful quote from Anais Nin (brought to our attention by the inimitable site Brainpickings). Read it slowly because it's that good.
(Yes, we're enculturating you in Netiquette. We can hear the shouty, complainy e-mails already.)
"The secret of a full life is to live and relate to others as if they might not be there tomorrow, as if you might not be there tomorrow. ... This thought has made me more and more attentive to all encounters, meetings, introductions, which might contain the seed of depth that might be carelessly overlooked.
"This feeling has become a rarity, and rarer every day now that we have reached a hastier and more superficial rhythm, now that we believe we are in touch with a greater amount of people, more people, more countries. This is the illusion which might cheat us of being in touch deeply with the one breathing next to us. The dangerous time when mechanical voices, radios, telephones, take the place of human intimacies, and the concept of being in touch with millions brings a greater and greater poverty in intimacy and human vision."
Nin wrote those words in 1946, but she might as well have been writing them today. She starts with a YOLO and ends with a contemporary-sounding rumination of just how horrible we've all become now that we hold the power to be in touch with millions of people in the palms of our hands.
That's right, we're talking about how annoying and rude and antisocial we've all become with our smartphones and tablets. As CNN investigates all the ways mobile devices are changing our lives, we'd like to peel our eyes off our glowing screens long enough to recount our top eight egregious handheld errors.
These are things you literally could not do before the www went mobile; now we're embarrassing ourselves all over the place. Please stop:
1. Drunk -tweeting, -texting, -Instagramming, etc.
Long gone are the days when the only witnesses to your inebriated ramblings were other bar patrons who also saw you stumble from your bar stool to the ground. Whether you're able to keep it together with spelling and syntax (in which case, you've just got the world going, "Wait, she wants to do WHAT to Paul Ryan?!"), or your typing skills erode quickly, alcohol and mobile devices don't mix.
2. Fooling around on your phone whenever you have a spare moment.
As writer Austin Kleon writes in his alarmingly cute book, "Steal Like an Artist," we need unstructured time for creativity to foster, down time in which we mess around and let our disconnected thoughts gel into cool ideas.
If you turn every spare moment (a red light, a line at the salad station, a ride in the elevator) into an excuse to check your Cinemagram feed, you just won't have those artistic a ha! moments. (And no, "Draw Something" doesn't count.)
3. Passive-aggressively whining for the whole world to see.
Look, we all have our personal stock of First World Problems, frustrated complaints with the minor injustices committed by a cruel, uncaring world. That's been true since the dawn of time. Now we just have myriad means of expressing them.
Nobody cares about your thinly veiled railings against your ex or roommate or employer, OK? Unless you've scribbled it on a notepad, in which case you should share it with the world on. So that we can laugh at you.
4. Being really, really scared to actually use the phone.
Phones and tablets have made it oh so easy to communicate without using our voiceboxes. This is bad for relationships for oh so many reasons. Anais Nin would just hate it. Hit "dial" and enjoy the time-honored pas de deux of two humans, you know, talking.
5. Missing your favorite band's concert because you're so busy taking crappy photos, letting your phone ring and fiddling with your phone during the set.
Your hard-of-hearing, reformed punk-rock uncle was right: Concerts really WERE better back in the day, not necessarily because music really meant something, man, but because the audience actually paid attention and sang along and danced instead of holding their phones in the air and spending 30-plus seconds trying to find the shutter button on the front of the screen.
Your punkle would be so disappointed if he still made it out to shows today.
6. Texting salacious pictures.
The ritual sharing of NC-17 photos used to be a complicated analog affair involving Polaroids and furtive looks. Nowadays, people just drop trou, snap and send. Analyze THAT, Anais Nin.
7. Turning your friends into enemies with videos of them.
Camcorders have become tiny and discreet and as user-friendly as checking your e-mail. This is potentially bad news for those people you hang out with, as you hold in your hands a recording device that can humiliate them forever.

Amazon Wants Apple's 'Appstore' Claim Thrown Out


(CN) - Amazon.com asked a California federal judge to reject Apple's claim that the online retail giant's use of the term "appstore" is a case of false advertising.    
Apple's lawsuit, filed in March 2011, alleges that Amazon.com's use of the name "Amazon Appstore" violates its App Store trademark. Last November, Apple amended the complaint to include allegations that the use of "Appstore" amounts to false advertising and could confuse consumers into believing the Amazon Appstore is related to or sponsored by Apple.    
Amazon argued in a motion filed in U.S. District Court in Oakland on Wednesday that the term has become so generic that it isn't misleading, and cited Apple's own CEOs referring to their competitors' stores as app stores.    

"For example, former Apple CEO Steve Jobs touted the superiority of Apple's 'integrated app store' in comparison to what he described as 'the four app stores on Android'," the court filing stated.    
Amazon also cited current CEO Tim Cook talking about "the number of app stores out there" in reference to non-Apple marketplaces.    
"Apple presumably does not contend that its past and present CEOs made false statements regarding those other app stores to thousands of investors in earning calls. To the contrary, the term 'app store' to refer to stores selling apps is commonplace in the industry and not a false statement," Amazon said.    
A false advertising claim does not stand, according to Amazon, because Apple has not identified a single false statement that Amazon has made about the Amazon Appstore in its advertising.    
"The word 'Appstore' is part of the name of Amazon's store; it is not a statement about the nature, characteristics, or qualities of Amazon's store, much less a false one," the filing stated. Amazon said that Apple's arguments lie in the trademark arena, and not in false advertising. Amazon is requesting that the court grant a summary judgment for Amazon on Apple's false advertising claim.

Amazon Wants Apple's 'Appstore' Claim Thrown Out


(CN) - Amazon.com asked a California federal judge to reject Apple's claim that the online retail giant's use of the term "appstore" is a case of false advertising.    
Apple's lawsuit, filed in March 2011, alleges that Amazon.com's use of the name "Amazon Appstore" violates its App Store trademark. Last November, Apple amended the complaint to include allegations that the use of "Appstore" amounts to false advertising and could confuse consumers into believing the Amazon Appstore is related to or sponsored by Apple.    
Amazon argued in a motion filed in U.S. District Court in Oakland on Wednesday that the term has become so generic that it isn't misleading, and cited Apple's own CEOs referring to their competitors' stores as app stores.    

"For example, former Apple CEO Steve Jobs touted the superiority of Apple's 'integrated app store' in comparison to what he described as 'the four app stores on Android'," the court filing stated.    
Amazon also cited current CEO Tim Cook talking about "the number of app stores out there" in reference to non-Apple marketplaces.    
"Apple presumably does not contend that its past and present CEOs made false statements regarding those other app stores to thousands of investors in earning calls. To the contrary, the term 'app store' to refer to stores selling apps is commonplace in the industry and not a false statement," Amazon said.    
A false advertising claim does not stand, according to Amazon, because Apple has not identified a single false statement that Amazon has made about the Amazon Appstore in its advertising.    
"The word 'Appstore' is part of the name of Amazon's store; it is not a statement about the nature, characteristics, or qualities of Amazon's store, much less a false one," the filing stated. Amazon said that Apple's arguments lie in the trademark arena, and not in false advertising. Amazon is requesting that the court grant a summary judgment for Amazon on Apple's false advertising claim.

Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 review


Design and build
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 looks identical to its Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 sibling, which as we pointed out in our hands-on review looks pretty cheap with its glossy white plastic casing. However, given that the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 is an affordable device at just £250 SIM free, we can look past that minor aesthetic flaw.
The plastic shell is good for one thing though, and that's portability. The tablet measures just 9.7mm thin and weighs a mere 588g, noticeably lighter than the latest Apple Ipad. We quite happily carried the tablet around in our bag and barely even noticed that it was there, which can't be said for Apple's best-selling alternative.
Although it looks fairly similar to it's predecessor, the original Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1, on first impression, there are a few cosmetic differences between this two. As well as being thinner, the newer Galaxy Tab has a more obvious silver trim, along with an expanded bezel that houses a pair of fairly large speakers. While we think this is all fairly attractive, we can't help but think that Samsung made these changes just to avoid another legal quarrel with arch-rival Apple.

Screen
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 screen certainly sounds decent on paper, measuring unsurprisingly 10.1in and boasting 800x1280 resolution. It proved pretty impressive during our hands-on testing, and although it's just your run-of-the-mill TFT panel, viewing angles were surprisingly good. While we did spot the occasional pixel flaws, the display proved clear and vibrant during our testing, if not all that impressive for on-the-go gaming.

Users who have used the latest Ipad will probably notice the difference in quality however, as with 149ppi pixel density compared to the Ipad's 246ppi, there is a clear difference in image clarity.

By Carly Page



AT&T Adds Samsung Galaxy Note II, Galaxy Tab 2 10.1, Rugby Pro To Its Line Up



Leading US operator AT&T has announced that it will add two new Samsung Galaxy smartphones to its inventory, apart from the previously-announced Galaxy Note II and Galaxy Tab 2 10.1. AT&T has further added to its Galaxy pool the 4G LTE Express and Rugby Pro. Samsung has been saying that the Galaxy Express will be the right product for first-time smartphone users. This is going to be an Android 4.0-based device with a 4.5-inch Super AMOLED Plus touch screen. It will have a 1.5-GHz dual-core processor and 2000 mAh battery. The Rugby Pro is for those who are a little more active on their smartphone. It “can handle whatever life throws at it,” a Samsung news release claims. This phone is waterproof, shock resistant and dust-proof. It comes a 4-inch WVGA Super AMOLED display and a 5-megapixel rear camera. The Rugby Pro would have access to Enhanced Push-to-Talk.
AT&T had announced the addition of Galaxy Note II last month after it included the Galaxy Note smartphone/tablet combo to its offerings. The Galaxy Note II has a 5.5-inch screen, Android 4.1 Jelly Bean and 1.6-GHz quad-core Exynos processor.
While the availability and pricing for these devices is not known, Samsung has announced that these products will soon be available to US carriers.
AT&T’s 4G LTE network expanded last week to include Detroit, Honolulu, Seattle, and Pittsburgh.